Comments on: Execution Counts Too

By: Gmoney

Gmoney — Mon, 28 Dec 2009 19:44:01 +0000

WhAT?!?!?! NOTHING IN USE IN STANDARD?!!

I bought Slivers JUST FOR THE ROOTBOUND CRAG!!!!!!!!! All the other cards are just for casual play sure, but that ONE LAND.

By: Magic in 2010 – A Wishlist of Predictions | Gathering Magic - A Magic the Gathering Forum and Blog for Spoilers, MTG Combos, Zendikar, Worldwake, Rise of the Eldrazi, Tactics and MTGO

Mon, 28 Dec 2009 17:34:43 +0000

[...] on. We here at Gathering Magic have explained the shortcomings of Premium Decks: Slivers here and here. Why then would we be excited about the next release of the Premium series? Say what you want [...]

By: chambermaggit

chambermaggit — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 06:55:48 +0000

the sliver deck is indeed pure shit compared to what it should be. no taste or opinion about it. like they said if its a premium deck then make it a premium playable deck. slivers are amazing and its not really hard to make them work. charge $50 i would have bought it, but after seeing whats in it i didnt buy it for what it is. the duel decks dont bother me much cuz i can see them as just begginer decks and they are not a lot of cash. i dont really buy anything but booster boxes and singles online for my decks, other than the from the vaults shit and was going to get the slivers but not now.

By: sweetestsadist

sweetestsadist — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:23:25 +0000

Your right about the Crystaline Sliver, but you can get a set of Necrotics for under $3.00. Just because it’s good doesn’t mean its coveted or has trade value. Constructed play value, being out of print for a while, and rarity determine that.

By: sweetestsadist

sweetestsadist — Sat, 14 Nov 2009 12:33:58 +0000

I voted for Tactics. It did sound interesting. But I wasn’t thinking about it as a Magic product, though. I was thinking about other video games with Tactics in the title. Those are good regardless of the theme.

By: Reinhart

Reinhart — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 22:17:25 +0000

Hillarious addition to this conversation:
http://www.wizards.com/Magic/Magazine/Article.aspx?x=mtg/daily/ld/64

25% said NONE OF THESE
25% said PvC which has exactly ZERO info revealed so far
and the rest is almost EXACTLY split between the rest.